58 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Chapter 5, Perkins addresses the common criticism that his philosophy neglects children’s needs. He argues that planning to die with zero does not mean ignoring family responsibilities, but rather being more intentional about when and how to transfer wealth to children or charities.
Perkins challenges the conventional practice of leaving inheritances after death, describing it as inefficient and potentially selfish. According to statistics he cites from the Federal Reserve, most people receive inheritances around age 60, long past the time when financial assistance would have maximum impact on their lives. This timing results from the typical 20-year age gap between parents and children, combined with average lifespans of around 80 years. Perkins characterizes this approach as leaving important outcomes to randomness: Random amounts of money going to random people at random times.
To illustrate this point, Perkins shares the story of Virginia Collins, who struggled financially as a single mother raising four children while her parents, who had substantial wealth, waited until their deaths to share it. When Virginia finally received her inheritance at age 49, she was financially stable, and the money, while appreciated, arrived too late to help during her years of greatest need. Perkins argues that this timing failure represents poor planning rather than genuine generosity.
The author suggests that the optimal time to give money to children is between ages 26 and 35. This range balances maturity and responsibility with youth and opportunity, allowing recipients to maximize the value of financial gifts. Perkins conducted an informal poll in which more than half of 3,500 respondents agreed with this age range as ideal for receiving inheritance. He notes that money received past this optimal age delivers diminishing returns as health declines and life opportunities narrow.
Perkins extends his philosophy to charitable giving, asserting that donations should occur during one’s lifetime rather than through bequests. He criticizes the widely praised story of Sylvia Bloom, a secretary who accumulated $8.2 million and donated it upon her death, suggesting that her charity could have helped more people had she given earlier. In contrast, Perkins admires philanthropist Chuck Feeney’s “giving while living” approach, which inspired figures like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.
Beyond financial considerations, Perkins emphasizes that a person’s true legacy includes experiences shared with children. He references research showing that adults who received affection and guidance from parents during childhood enjoy better health and lower depression rates later in life. Perkins encourages readers to consider the trade-off between earning more money and spending time with children, suggesting that additional work hours may actually deplete rather than enhance a parent’s legacy when they come at the expense of meaningful family experiences.
The chapter concludes with recommendations for readers to determine specific ages at which they want to give money to their children and charities, to discuss these plans with partners, and to consult with estate planners or lawyers. Perkins reiterates his central message: Giving money at the right time maximizes its impact, and waiting until death represents a missed opportunity to witness the benefits of one’s generosity.
In Chapter 6, Perkins challenges conventional financial wisdom about saving and spending throughout one’s lifetime. The chapter begins with Perkins recounting how his boss, Joe Farrell, advised him against excessive frugality in his twenties, explaining that his income would increase over time. This advice contradicted traditional financial guidance but aligned with economic theory that suggests young people with promising career trajectories should enjoy their money rather than aggressively save.
Perkins explains how he initially overcompensated by becoming excessively spendthrift after receiving this advice, purchasing luxury items without consideration for their value. He eventually discovered that neither extreme—excessive saving nor careless spending—optimizes lifetime fulfillment. The author critiques budgeting formulas such as Elizabeth Warren’s 50-30-20 rule, arguing that saving percentages should vary throughout one’s life rather than remain constant.
Central to the chapter is Perkins’s theory that one’s ability to extract enjoyment from money diminishes with age due to declining health. He illustrates this concept by describing how physical capabilities decline over time, limiting the activities one can enjoy regardless of financial resources. Perkins shares several personal anecdotes, including his 69-year-old friend who struggled with a short swim and his own realization that wakeboarding was something he needed to do at age 50 or never.
The author introduces the concept of the “personal interest rate,” which represents how much someone would need to compensate you to delay an experience. This rate increases with age because older individuals have less time remaining and often less physical capability to enjoy experiences later. For young people, delaying gratification can make sense because they can generally have similar experiences later, but for older people, postponing experiences becomes increasingly costly.
Perkins proposes balancing three key resources throughout life: health, money, and free time. Young people typically have health and time but lack money. Middle-aged individuals often have improved finances but face time constraints. Elderly people may have time and money but diminished health. At each stage, people should exchange abundant resources to gain scarce ones.
The author emphasizes that health is the most valuable resource because it affects enjoyment of all experiences. He describes how even small health improvements can compound positively over time, while small declines can lead to accelerating deterioration. Perkins recommends that people of all ages invest more in preventative health measures rather than solely focusing on treatment later in life.
For middle-aged individuals with more money than time, Perkins advocates trading money for time by outsourcing unpleasant tasks like laundry or housecleaning. He cites research showing that people who spend money on time-saving purchases experience greater life satisfaction regardless of income level.
In Chapter 5, Perkins addresses a common objection to his “Die With Zero” philosophy: the concern about providing for one’s children. This chapter confronts the societal expectation that responsible parents should leave significant inheritances to their offspring. The Importance of Experiences and Memories runs throughout this chapter as Perkins argues that a parent’s true legacy consists of shared experiences rather than monetary inheritances. “Your real legacy for your kids consists of the experiences you shared with your children, especially when they’re growing up, the lessons and other memories you’ve imparted to them,” Perkins states, fundamentally shifting the definition of legacy from financial to experiential (91). This redefinition serves to align with his overall philosophy about prioritizing experiences over wealth accumulation. Perkins supports this argument with references to scientific research showing that young adults who received affection from their parents develop better personal relationships and experience lower rates of substance abuse and depression (92). The concept of “memory dividends” features prominently here, suggesting that memories of shared experiences continue to provide value long after they occur. This perspective frames parental responsibility not as wealth preservation but as memory creation.
The analytical framework Perkins employs throughout this chapter centers on optimizing the impact of financial resources through intentional timing. He creates a distinction between “your money” and money allocated for others, arguing that once a person designates funds for their children or charity, those funds should be transferred at the optimal moment for maximum impact. This framework emphasizes efficiency, impact, and intentionality rather than the traditional metrics of total amount accumulated or preserved. Perkins repeatedly contrasts intentional giving with unintentional bequests, suggesting that many inheritances represent nothing more than “leftovers” from precautionary saving rather than deliberately planned gifts. The chapter concludes with practical recommendations for readers, encouraging them to consult with estate planners while considering the optimal ages at which to give money to their children and favorite charities.
Chapter 6 introduces Perkins’s “Rule Number 6: ‘Don’t Live Your Life On Autopilot,’” which addresses how people should balance spending and saving throughout their lives (103). The concept of Becoming Intentional About Time, Money, and Health forms a central theme as Perkins argues against living life on autopilot. He introduces a model incorporating three essential resources—health, free time, and money—explaining how their availability fluctuates throughout life. “To get the most positive life experiences at any age, you must balance your life, and this requires you to exchange an abundant resource in order to get more of a scarce one,” Perkins explains, establishing a framework for intentional resource allocation (120). This approach requires actively assessing one’s current situation rather than following predetermined rules or societal expectations. Perkins emphasizes that different life stages require different approaches to spending and saving, contrasting with conventional financial advice that prescribes uniform savings rates regardless of age or circumstance. This theme culminates in Perkins’s development of a “personal interest rate,” which rises with age and helps determine when to delay experiences versus having them immediately (128).
Perkins uses several rhetorical devices throughout the chapter, most notably the extended metaphor of “autopilot” to represent unexamined financial decisions. This metaphor effectively contrasts unconscious habit with the deliberate, intentional approach he advocates. He also uses storytelling extensively, incorporating personal anecdotes about his own financial mistakes alongside stories about others. These narratives humanize abstract concepts while demonstrating the real-world consequences of following or ignoring his advice. Perkins also employs hypothetical scenarios to illustrate concepts in relatable terms. The writing demonstrates a carefully constructed progression from problem identification (uniform savings rates don’t work for everyone) through theoretical frameworks (the health-time-money triangle) to practical applications (how to determine when to delay gratification versus when to indulge).
Throughout both chapters, Perkins consistently emphasizes the importance of intentionality over societal expectations or autopilot behaviors. He advocates for a data-driven, personalized approach to financial decisions that accounts for individual circumstances and preferences rather than following generalized rules. This philosophy extends beyond financial matters to encompass health investments and time allocation, creating a holistic framework for life optimization. The text challenges conventional financial wisdom not by rejecting the importance of saving but by questioning when, how much, and for what purpose people should save. By focusing on maximizing “lifetime fulfillment” rather than wealth accumulation, Perkins reframes financial planning as a means to an experiential end rather than an end in itself.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: