49 pages • 1 hour read
SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapter 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Chapter 3 Summary: “Unbelievable Stories About Apathy and Altruism”
Chapter 3 begins by revisiting the infamous 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese in Queens, New York, a case that is often cited as evidence of pervasive societal apathy. The original narrative pushed by the media claimed that Genovese, a young woman, was pursued by a murderer down the street of her own neighborhood and was slain while resisting and screaming for help. The murderer then just walked away. According to journalists who got their information from the police, 38 neighbors passively witnessed the attack without intervening or even calling 911. This case therefore became a powerful symbol of urban indifference and led to public outcry, with the supposedly indifferent neighbors receiving death threats of their own. However, Levitt and Dubner reexamine this account, pointing out that some neighbors did take action, including shouting at the attacker and attempting to call the police. Though these responses may still be considered inadequate, this reframing highlights the fact that initial reports exaggerated the public’s lack of response. In this way, Levitt and Dubner stress the importance of reexamining the ways in which media narratives can oversimplify human behavior in complex situations. The media’s narrative at the time also pushed for a political backlash against a perceived crime rise, justifying draconian police procedures in “bad” neighborhoods and greater police surveillance overall.
The focus then shifts to experiments that are designed to study altruism and fairness in human behavior. Levitt and Dubner explain the Dictator Game and the Ultimatum Game: two key experiments from behavioral economics. In the Dictator Game, participants are given money to divide however they like between themselves and a second, passive participant. Although traditional economic theory predicts that people will keep the entire sum because there is no penalty for not sharing, many people choose to share a portion, and this pattern suggests an innate concern for fairness. Similarly, in the Ultimatum Game, where the recipient can reject their portion if they feel it is unfair, recipients often did just that. This makes little sense from a purely economic perspective, since the options are either no money or a small portion. However, the recipients regularly reject insulting offers, preferring to send a message about fairness rather than gaining a negligible amount of money. Because of this factor, proposers frequently offer fairer divisions in order to avoid losing everything. These games demonstrate that human decisions are often influenced by a blend of self-interest and social expectations.
From here, the authors discuss the idea that context alters behavior. To this end, they draw on the work of economist John List, who conducted field experiments to test altruism in real-world settings. For example, List studied how sports card dealers interacted with inexperienced buyers at markets. He found that in natural settings, without the scrutiny of a controlled environment, dealers were far more likely to act on the basis of self-interest (e.g., making lower offers to naïve buyers). These findings underscore the ways in which behavior is influenced by the surrounding environment and the visibility of one’s actions, suggesting that shows of altruism can diminish when external pressures are removed. The authors also point out that altruism and selfishness are often influenced by the unintended consequences of technological advancements, such as the introduction of television. They reference studies indicating that the advent of TV correlated with a rise in crime rates, as it inadvertently provided potential criminals with new ideas and methods. The authors underscore the complexity of human behavior and suggest that innovations can have unforeseen impacts on societal norms and actions. They also note that methods like experimental laboratory settings or even just a picture of eyes on a wall can improve people’s behavior, since they feel watched and judged.
The chapter concludes by examining organ donation, a topic that encompasses altruism, selfishness, and market dynamics. In the U.S., where organ sales are prohibited, kidney shortages result in long waiting lists and preventable deaths. By contrast, in Iran, where the government allows regulated kidney sales, the shortage has been eliminated. This difference might suggest that people only donate kidneys if there is a financial reward involved, but of course the medical risk of major surgery and the increased vulnerability of having only one kidney precludes people from donating without a compelling reason, such as a loved one’s health or a significant financial reward. Levitt and Dubner use this comparison to argue that incentives—both financial and social—play a critical role in shaping decisions around life-saving acts like organ donation. In their conclusion, Levitt and Dubner illustrate the broader point of Chapter 3’s title, asserting that stories attributing human activity to a single motivation, however compelling, should be viewed as having very little credibility. Instead, they posit that because human behavior is rarely guided by a single motive, seemingly selfless acts often involve a blend of altruism, self-interest, and contextual pressures.
Chapter 3 Analysis
In Chapter 3, the authors take a closer look at iconic historical incidents in order to analyze The Hidden Incentives Behind Human Behavior on an even deeper level. They also stress the complexity and interplay of incentives both hidden and visible, and their reassessment of the Kitty Genovese case serves as a powerful starting point. Although the dominant narrative painted a bleak picture of urban apathy and condemned the 38 witnesses for allegedly ignoring her pleas for help, the authors reveal that some neighbors did take decisive action. This reexamination suggests that the media’s portrayal of societal indifference was oversimplified and reshaped to construct a compelling story. The incentives for individuals to act—or not to act—can be influenced by fear, confusion, or a lack of clear social expectations in emergencies.
The discussion of altruism in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games further highlights the nuanced incentives driving decisions. In these games, participants act against purely self-interested behavior by sharing resources or rejecting unfair offers, even when it leads to personal loss. This suggests that human actions are often shaped by a mix of selfishness and social norms. Fairness and reputation play a key role, as people are motivated not only by material gain but also by the desire to maintain social harmony or signal fairness to others. These findings reveal that incentives are rarely one-dimensional, and decisions often balance self-interest with a broader awareness of social consequences.
This chapter also continues Levitt and Dubner’s focus on revealing The Role of Data and Economic Principles in Understanding Societal Issues. For example, the authors use the Dictator and Ultimatum Games to show how theoretical models of human behavior—such as the idea that people are entirely self-interested—fall short in explaining real-world decisions. The data from these experiments contradicts pure economic rationality, revealing instead a willingness to prioritize fairness and social expectations over financial gain. This finding challenges conventional wisdom and demonstrates the value of empirical research in uncovering the true motivations behind human actions.
Similarly, the authors use the work of economist John List to underscore the importance of studying behavior in real-world contexts. List’s experiments with sports card dealers illustrate that people behave differently when they feel unobserved. For example, dealers were more likely to exploit inexperienced buyers when external oversight was absent: a pattern suggesting that altruism often diminishes in environments where actions are private or hidden. This dynamic reinforces the idea that behavior is context-dependent and that understanding societal issues requires studying both the economic incentives and the situational factors that shape decisions.
John List’s research also showcases the power of unconventional thinking. By taking economic experiments out of the lab and into real-world settings, he provides a more accurate picture of human behavior, revealing insights that controlled studies might miss. This approach underscores the importance of tailoring solutions to the complexities of real-life environments rather than relying solely on theoretical models.
The chapter’s discussion of organ donation further demonstrates how economic principles can illuminate societal challenges. In the U.S., where organ sales are prohibited, the lack of financial incentives contributes to a severe kidney shortage. By contrast, Iran’s regulated organ market has eliminated this shortage, illustrating how introducing monetary incentives can address critical supply-and-demand imbalances. This example highlights the practical applications of economic principles in addressing complex societal issues and demonstrates the potential of data-driven policies to inform better outcomes.
When exploring The Application of Unconventional Solutions to Global Challenges, Levitt and Dubner use the example of organ donation to emphasize the need to think beyond traditional frameworks. While many societies rely on altruism to drive organ donations, the authors explore the possibility of using financial incentives to encourage more donors. This idea challenges moral and cultural taboos around the commodification of body parts but offers a pragmatic solution to a life-and-death issue. By comparing the U.S. and Iran, Levitt and Dubner make a compelling case for rethinking rigid ethical stances in order to address urgent needs. This particular argument also conforms to the bold, deliberately provocative approach that characterizes the source text as a whole.
In a further examination of indirect yet far-reaching effects, the authors also explore the unintended consequences of technological advancements, such as the rise of television. While TV is often credited with spreading information and entertainment, studies show that its omnipresence may also inspire criminal behavior by exposing viewers to new methods of committing crimes. This example highlights the complexity of innovations and the need for unconventional solutions that anticipate and mitigate potential negative effects. For instance, the authors suggest that integrating education or public awareness campaigns with technological advancements could help to counteract unintended harms.
By emphasizing the importance of empirical data and challenging traditional assumptions, the authors promote a critical approach to societal issues and suggest innovative approaches to solving them. This chapter ultimately reinforces the broader themes of SuperFreakonomics: the idea that human behavior is rarely guided by a single motivation, and that understanding the hidden dynamics behind decisions is the key to crafting effective, data-driven solutions.
Unlock all 49 pages of this Study GuidePlus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Related Titles
By these authors
