61 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide features depictions of violence, death and racism.
As a novel, True Grit does not shy away from conflict. The characters share a preoccupation with violence, particularly the violence of the past. Most prominent among these is Rooster Cogburn. There is little doubt that Rooster is a violent man. He introduces himself to the audience with a vivid account of killing two men and wounding another. Though he is supposedly an agent of the law, the court calls into question the necessity of his violence. Even in the recent past, Rooster’s accounts of violence are obfuscated to hide his true brutality. Similarly, his references to his actions during the Civil War are often romanticized. He speaks fondly—particularly when he is drunk—of the past when he was not constrained by laws and expectations. When others call his version of events into question, however, Rooster’s military history seems much more brutal, much more untethered, and much more immoral. Rooster, burdened by the horror of what he has done to people, tries to romanticize his war record. In a nation where most of his peers fought in the same way, however, he struggles to hide the truth. The past is a brutal place for Rooster. He is still fighting that same war, even as the world changes around him. With this changing world comes the dawning realization that what he did was not good, romantic, or moral.
When Mattie meets Rooster, he is struggling with the tension between his competing identities. He views himself as a good man. He is a good marshal, he believes, even if he cheats on his expense reports. Rooster is convinced that his violent methods are necessary to stop the triumph of truly evil men. This is the same excuse he told himself during the Civil War; Rooster is still fighting according to these ideas, even as the world modernizes. As such, Rooster feels out of place in the world. He operates on the boundaries of society, where his reputation and his deeds are more tolerated. In this sense, he is very similar to Ned and the outlaws, many of whom first tasted violence during the Civil War. When the fighting ended, they found no place for themselves in society. Rooster was similar, so much so that he robbed banks and committed crimes, unable to settle down. In his work as a marshal, however, he found a vent for his anger and his violence. He made a living chasing down and killing men who were also fighting the last war. The brutality of the Civil War lingered on after the peace; the Wild West became a battleground for the last brutal vestiges of that old violence as old fights were refought between bandits and lawmen. Yet, this world is now changing. Modernity cannot be denied, and there is no place in the world any longer for men like Rooster, Ned, Jesse James, or the outlaws and lawmen who are still fighting long-dead wars.
When she is an old woman, Mattie learns that Rooster is part of a traveling show. He is billed as a relic and presented as a museum piece, appearing alongside actual outlaws. These outlaws are legally forbidden from actually performing their deeds, while—by the team she has arrived—Rooster has died from longstanding health issues. The violent past has been commoditized and repackaged into entertainment for the nascent 20th century. Rooster lived long enough to see himself become an antique. The only place he could find in the world was one that deliberately repackaged his violence as frivolous entertainment. Each day, he could relive his violent past by shooting targets with the explicit assurance on the advertising posters that no one would be hurt. In this traveling circus, old enemies live alongside one another. Cole Younger, Frank James, and Rooster Cogburn may once have been enemies, but they become united in their old age. They have lived too long to feel at home anywhere in this modern age, so they console themselves in one another’s company, reliving old wars through the commercialized nostalgia of the traveling circus.
Mattie Ross sets out to avenge her father’s killer. For all her gumption and strength of character, however, she recognizes a difficult truth: She is a 14-year-old girl, someone who is not taken seriously by society and someone who lacks the training and resources to go up against a hardened gang of criminals. Yet this does not dissuade her. Mattie is motivated not only by a religious and moral desire that Tom Chaney should be punished but also by an unspoken emotional need for retribution. Revenge is a flimsy, vague notion for a practical person like Mattie, but she cannot deny herself this need. She picks Rooster from other, better marshals because he is best positioned to satisfy her immature but unspoken bloodlust. Rooster, she hopes, will become her emotional avatar in a society that constantly marginalizes her due to her age, gender, and status. In this sense, Rooster’s true grit is precisely what Mattie craves. She wants the most brutal, most ruthless enforcer of the law because her desire for revenge is brutal and ruthless. Mattie selects for grit because she feels grit best represents her own emotional pursuit of revenge. Mattie chooses Rooster to be as much of a weapon to her as her dead father’s pistol.
Rooster is billed as a man with true grit, but this curmudgeonly (and often vicious) exterior masks a deep sadness. Though Rooster may be able to excuse, obfuscate, or outright lie about many of the more violent episodes in his past, they live on in his memories. His defense of the law—his excuse for killing men like the Wharton brothers—is hypocritical and hollow, particularly given his past actions and his war record. He is a drunk and a womanizer, someone who is hard to live with. He struggles to live with himself. He drinks heavily as a way to blur his own mind, allowing him to escape from himself into the character of Rooster that he has created. But, in Mattie, for a brief moment, he finds a cause to give his life purpose. Mattie wants him to embark on a righteous mission of revenge against a villainous man. He accepts her low pay, and he accepts her company because she offers him something even more valuable: the chance, even for a brief moment, to be a hero. Rooster wants to live up to her expectations of him, to be a man with true grit rather than the brutal drunk that he fears he has become.
The idea of true grit, however, is not limited to Rooster. Mattie may hire Rooster because of his apparent grit and determination, but this is also part of a complex reflection of her own sense of self. Mattie is marginalized by society, particularly in the wake of her father’s death. She is constantly being cautioned by well-intentioned people who want her to return home to her family to grieve. Mattie refuses to do so. She seeks out a man with true grit because she sees these values in herself. If she refuses to adhere to social expectations, then she wants to find a marshal who can act similarly. She hires Rooster not because he is so different from her but because he is so similar. In her old age, Mattie demonstrates the extent to which she has come to resemble Rooster. She never marries, refusing to conform to social expectations and criticizing those who gossip about her just like Rooster criticized those who told stories about him behind his back. Like Rooster, Mattie is a fearsome opponent. She runs her family, her church, and her bank. Even in a patriarchal society that marginalizes women, she has risen to a position of relative power. She may have lost an arm, but she has lost none of the indomitable spirit that she once sought out in Rooster Cogburn. Mattie shows herself to be a woman of true grit. Though she comes to Rooster too late, she insists that his body must be reburied on her terms. Mattie buries Rooster in the manner that she believes he deserves, even if he (and most other people) may never have considered him to be quite so deserving. Rooster taught Mattie the strength and the defiance that would shape her life. Rooster showed Mattie the meaning of true grit, and for this, she is forever thankful. To her, at least, he was a hero.
After Tom Chaney kills Frank Ross, he flees into the night. He has committed murder, but Mattie is shocked to discover that the authorities in Fort Smith have no real inclination to pursue him. He has fled into Indigenous territory, the name given to the regions in the United States which were governed by the Indigenous tribes. These territories had their own law enforcement and, due to the complex web of jurisdictional authorities and legal permissions, certain officers and agents could not pursue men like Chaney across this border. In the conventions of the Western genre, the invocation of the Indigenous territory creates a sense of otherness. The border between the territory and the rest of the United States is, for the white American characters, the border between law and chaos, between the known and the unknown. Chaney has fled into this wild unknown, a place where only a select few United States marshals are permitted to follow. Mattie recognizes the biblical precedent of this issue, claiming that “the wicked flee where none pursueth” (117). Chaney’s wickedness is defined, for Mattie, by his willingness to cross the border into the place where most people will not go.
For people like Mattie, the Indigenous territory is an alien place. The border that separates her from the territory is likened to a border between civilization and chaos, an attitude that is reflected in the townspeople of Fort Smith. They recognize the otherness of the place across the border, even as they criticize Fort Smith itself. This sense of otherized violence, however, is shown to be hollow. Even in Fort Smith, a small town that is one of the supposed last bastions of civilization before the border, is beset by violence. Chaney killed Frank Ross in Fort Smith because gambling and drunkenness were permitted in the town. The entire town gathers to watch a hanging, in which the execution of three men (including an Indigenous man) is turned into a public spectacle. Rooster Cogburn, a supposed agent of law and order, rages against the bureaucracy of the same legal system that he represents. He makes a mockery of the court by willfully lying while the public defender pridefully attempts to defend a man who is shown later to be a brutal criminal. Every legal institution that supposedly defines American civilization in contrast to Native chaos is, in reality, soaked in blood and hypocrisy.
The apparent violence beyond the border is more of a mirror, reflecting back the true brutality of American existence in the late 19th century. To emphasize this, the novel names real people. Judge Isaac Parker was a real man, known as “the Hanging Judge,” for his tendency to sentence men to death. Likewise, Frank James and Cole Younger were historical outlaws who reflect the brutality of the era. In contrast to these brutal men, some of whom are backed by the government, the Indigenous characters are quiet and benign. The Indigenous territory is talked about as though it is a lawless place, but the novel presents the real men of the world as the most violent and the most brutal. It is the violence within the borders of so-called civilization that is to be feared most, violence which then crosses over into the rapidly diminishing Indigenous territory by savage men like Rooster Cogburn.
Rooster is one of the few men legally permitted to traverse the border between the known and the unknown. In spite of his many faults, the so-called civilization imbues him with the authority to kill in the Indigenous territories. Rather than represent the court, Rooster is a law unto himself. He represents an ill-defined, guttural interpretation of right and wrong, a system of morality that is fraught with contradictions, lies, and falsehoods. Rooster’s power is that he is able to cross the border within himself, locating a primal violence and brutality that is not constrained by civilization. His true grit is, in effect, his ability to denude himself of the constraints of civilization. In the Indigenous territories, free from society’s judgment but invested with so-called society’s power, he is free to enforce the law as he sees fit. The novel rarely portrays actual Indigenous culture or law. Rather, the Indigenous territory is a staging ground for social critique, a place in which American society can be stripped bare to its most brutal, self-aggrandizing truth.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Action & Adventure
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Community Reads
View Collection
Daughters & Sons
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
War
View Collection
Westerns
View Collection